Swedish Green Party Rally at Almedalsveckan 2014 (attended by activists from the anti-nuclear movement and the Feminist Initiative)
My research interests focus on the intersection of social movements, political behavior and party politics. Specifically, I am interested in how political participation beyond voting in national elections shapes political parties and political outcomes. In illuminating the effects of alternative forms of participation, I hope to offer insight into the nature of political representation in contemporary democracies. I employ a multi-method approach to address these questions and my book project centers on the role social movements play in influencing political parties with movement origins.
Further research projects focus on European referendums, the ideological moderation of center-left mainstream parties, and improving teaching methods.
Further research projects focus on European referendums, the ideological moderation of center-left mainstream parties, and improving teaching methods.
Publications
Blings, Steffen. 2020. “Niche Parties and Social Movements: Mechanisms of Programmatic Alignment and Party Success.” Government and Opposition, 55 (2), 220-240.
Blings, Steffen, and Alexander Gattig. 2019. “Exploring the potential for common European politics: Cross-national commonalities and differences in the European constitutional referendums.” Journal of European Integration, 41 (6), 711-728.
Blings, Steffen, and Sarah Maxey. 2017. “Teaching Students to Engage with Evidence: An Evaluation of Structured Writing and Classroom Discussion Strategies.” Journal of Political Science Education, 13 (1): 15-32.
Gattig, Alexander, and Steffen Blings. 2013. “Disaffected citizens? Why people vote in national referendums about EU treaty reform.” In Democratising the EU from Below? Citizenship, Civil Society and the Public Sphere, eds. Ulrike Liebert, Alexander Gattig, and Tatjana Evers. Surrey: Ashgate pp. 61–82.
Bargstedt, Matias, Steffen Blings, Christopher J. Anderson, and Russell J. Dalton. 2011. “Macro Level Data.” In Citizens, Context, and Choice. How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices, eds. Christopher J. Anderson, and Russell J. Dalton. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 257–268.
Essays and Other Writings
“Pressuring Parties: How European Social Movements Use Elections to Influence Parties.” 2016. Mobilizing Ideas blog. Center for the Study of Social Movements at Notre Dame (September 29). Invited post.
Blings, Steffen, and Alexander Gattig. 2019. “Exploring the potential for common European politics: Cross-national commonalities and differences in the European constitutional referendums.” Journal of European Integration, 41 (6), 711-728.
- In the print version of this article figure 1b was reproduced twice and figure 1a committed. You can find figure 1a here: Figure 1a.
- Online Appendix
Blings, Steffen, and Sarah Maxey. 2017. “Teaching Students to Engage with Evidence: An Evaluation of Structured Writing and Classroom Discussion Strategies.” Journal of Political Science Education, 13 (1): 15-32.
Gattig, Alexander, and Steffen Blings. 2013. “Disaffected citizens? Why people vote in national referendums about EU treaty reform.” In Democratising the EU from Below? Citizenship, Civil Society and the Public Sphere, eds. Ulrike Liebert, Alexander Gattig, and Tatjana Evers. Surrey: Ashgate pp. 61–82.
Bargstedt, Matias, Steffen Blings, Christopher J. Anderson, and Russell J. Dalton. 2011. “Macro Level Data.” In Citizens, Context, and Choice. How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices, eds. Christopher J. Anderson, and Russell J. Dalton. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 257–268.
Essays and Other Writings
“Pressuring Parties: How European Social Movements Use Elections to Influence Parties.” 2016. Mobilizing Ideas blog. Center for the Study of Social Movements at Notre Dame (September 29). Invited post.
Book Manuscript
Political Parties and Social Movements: Mobilizing and Representing Civil Society
Most political parties that emerged in Europe since 1945 have roots in social movements, but unlike older mainstream parties with movement origins they did not adopt an electoral-professional party model focused on pursuing the median voter. Neither have they retained their organizational connections to movements, thus foregoing both the advantages of a ``catch-all'' platform and access to the mobilizing capacity of movement organizations. Why? I employ a multi-method design combining the analysis of voters and movement party success with original data from fieldwork in Sweden and Germany on four movements and the Green and Pirate parties they spawned. I find that movements are incentivized to be organizationally distinct from parties in order to maximize their public support and influence on government policy. Parties cannot, however, break with their movement origins programmatically, because they rely on issue voters who are disappointed with the dominant mainstream party models. Thus movement parties counterbalance the trend towards catch-all and cartel parties and thereby (re-)integrate disaffected citizens into the democratic process. This equilibrium only breaks down when mainstream parties weaken and allow movement parties a path to major party status, as illustrated by recent developments in Southern Europe.
Working Papers
“Party Crashers: The Determinants of Left Party Ideological Shifts in Wealthy Democracies” With Stephen Nelson and Christopher Way.
“Movement Parties as Programmatic Parties: Substantive Gains and the Electoral Success of West European Green Parties.”
“Movement Parties as Programmatic Parties: Substantive Gains and the Electoral Success of West European Green Parties.”
